NEWS AND PUBLICATIONS

November 11, 2013 "Profit Test" as a pre-condition to dividend distribution (A motion to approve Derivative Action no. 49615-04-13 Lahav Vs. IDB Development Ltd. et al.)
November 11, 2013 The Boards duties to shareholders during merger approval procedures (Civil Case 9433-11-09 Mirkaei Tikshoret Ltd. et al. Vs. Gilat Satellites Networks Ltd. et al.)
December 17, 2013 A Violation of fiduciary duty by directors and officers (Civil Case 13484-03-09 Gad Hitron et al. Vs. Adi Teler)
November 28, 2013 A mechanism to adjust the exercise price of employees stock options plan
December 24, 2013 Public Utility Authority Electricity updates Feed-in-Tariff rates of residential and commercial PV systems
January 16, 2014 The minimal overall efficiency threshold of cogeneration plants is increased from 60% to 70%
 

December 17, 2013 A Violation of fiduciary duty by directors and officers (Civil Case 13484-03-09 Gad Hitron et al. Vs. Adi Teler)

The defendant (Adi Teler) served as CEO, director and shareholder of DSG Web Application Ltd. (the "Company"). Following the failure of a transaction between the Company and Klal Health Ltd. ("Klal") to be not carried out, the defendant established a new company fully owned by him (“Teldar") which succeeded in carrying out the same transaction with Klal which the Company had failed to carry out.

The court decided that by this action the defendant had violated his fiduciary duty to the Company and to the Company's shareholders (the plaintiffs), which prohibits the exploitation of the Company's opportunities by its directors and officers, regardless of whether the Company was indeed able to carry out the transaction.

 Although fiduciary duty is towards the Company only, under certain circumstances a fiduciary duty might apply towards a specific shareholder, when a special relationship (e.g., contractual) exists, and such a relationship had indeed existed with some of the Company's shareholders.

Compensation for breach of a fiduciary duty of an officer is usually determined by the degree of financial enrichment of the offender, regardless of the company's chances of succeeding in carrying out the transaction. Another way to determine compensation is based on the amount of damage caused to the Company, by considering the question: what would have happened had the fiduciary duty not been breached. In the absence of enrichment under the above circumstances, compensation is determined by the latter. 


Corporate Law


Commercial Transactions


Projects


Home | About Us | Areas of Practice | Our Team | News and Publications | Contact Us | עברית